From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katzman v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jul 26, 2013
125 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 5D12–4816.

2013-07-26

Scott KATZMAN, M.D. and Advanced Orthopaedics, P.A., Petitioners, v. WINN–DIXIE STORES, INC. and Michele Gould, Respondents.

Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, Michelle Morley, Judge. Kimberly P. Simoes and Mario B. Simoes, of The Simoes Law Group, P.A., DeLand, for Petitioners. Jennings L. Hurt, III and Richard S. Womble, of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McLain, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent Winn–Dixie Stores, Inc.


Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, Michelle Morley, Judge.
Kimberly P. Simoes and Mario B. Simoes, of The Simoes Law Group, P.A., DeLand, for Petitioners. Jennings L. Hurt, III and Richard S. Womble, of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McLain, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent Winn–Dixie Stores, Inc.
No Appearance for Respondent Michele Gould.

EVANDER, J.

Petitioners seek certiorari review of the trial court's denial of their motion for protective order from a subpoena duces tecum without deposition. We conclude that the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law in requiring Petitioners to produce the documents at issue. See Katzman v. Rediron Fabrication, Inc., 76 So.3d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Columbia Hosp. (Palm Beaches) Ltd. P'ship v. Hasson, 33 So.3d 148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

We interpret the trial court's order to limit Petitioners' obligation to produce those documents requested in paragraphs five and six of the subpoena to the three-year period immediately preceding the date of the filing of the subpoena.

However, to the extent the trial court failed to take appropriate measures to protect Petitioners from the dissemination of the documents (and/or confidential information contained therein), Petitioners are entitled to certiorari relief. A protective order or confidentiality agreement should be in place prior to release of the documents. Laser Spine Inst., LLC v. Makanast, 69 So.3d 1045 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

PETITION GRANTED, in part; DENIED, in part; and REMANDED.

LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.




Summaries of

Katzman v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jul 26, 2013
125 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Katzman v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Scott KATZMAN, M.D. and Advanced Orthopaedics, P.A., Petitioners, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jul 26, 2013

Citations

125 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)