From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katzenbach v. Armstrong Cork Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1928
140 A. 920 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Decided February 6th, 1928.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Mr. Henry J. Gaede, for the respondent.

Messrs. Starr, Summerill Lloyd, for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 99 N.J. Eq. 32. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Katzenbach v. Armstrong Cork Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1928
140 A. 920 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Katzenbach v. Armstrong Cork Co.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD L. KATZENBACH, attorney-general, respondent, v. ARMSTRONG CORK…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 6, 1928

Citations

140 A. 920 (N.J. 1928)
140 A. 920