From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katz v. Wiener

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 2003
302 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04146

Submitted November 13, 2002.

February 18, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered April 8, 2002, which granted the third-party defendants' motion to vacate an order of the same court, dated January 28, 2002, granting, without opposition, the defendants third-party plaintiffs' prior motion for a hearing to determine the amount of attorneys' fees owed to them, and, upon vacatur, denied the prior motion.

Joseph Frost, New York, N.Y., for appellants.

Hayes Lorenzo, Mineola, N.Y. (Robert T. Samson of counsel), respondents.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

"It is well settled that an owner who is only vicariously liable under the Labor Law may obtain full indemnification from the party wholly at fault * * * This common-law right of indemnification against the party actually at fault encompasses the right to recover attorneys' fees, costs, and disbursements incurred in connection with defending the suit brought by the injured party" (Chapel v. Mitchell, 84 N.Y.2d 345, 347). In this case, there has not yet been a determination that the defendants third-party plaintiffs were vicariously liable. Accordingly, they are not yet entitled to an award of attorneys' fees incurred in connection with defending against the plaintiff's claims.

FLORIO, J.P., FRIEDMANN, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Katz v. Wiener

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 2003
302 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Katz v. Wiener

Case Details

Full title:ALEC V. KATZ, plaintiff, v. PAUL WIENER, ET AL., defendants, 901 AVENUE H…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 18, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 284

Citing Cases

REY v. RIDAMASET, LLC

The defendants assert Commerce is entitled to contractual indemnification and both Commerce and Ridamaset are…

KOCZKA v. BATTERY PARK CITY AUTH.

Finally, a party who is vicariously liable for injuries solely pursuant to a statutory duty or by operation…