From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katz v. Curis Pharm.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 23, 2022
22-CV-644 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-644 (VSB)

02-23-2022

BRUCE E. KATZ, Plaintiff, v. CURIS PHARMACY, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff filed this action on January 25, 2022, (Doc. 1), and filed an affidavit of service on February 16, 2022, (Doc. 5). The deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's complaint was February 22, 2022. (See id.) To date, Defendant has not appeared or responded to the complaint. Plaintiff, however, has taken no action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, if Plaintiff intends to seek a default judgment, they are directed to do so in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than March 9, 2022. If Plaintiff fails to do so or otherwise demonstrate that they intend to prosecute this litigation, I may dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Katz v. Curis Pharm.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 23, 2022
22-CV-644 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Katz v. Curis Pharm.

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE E. KATZ, Plaintiff, v. CURIS PHARMACY, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 23, 2022

Citations

22-CV-644 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2022)