From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katz v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

July, 1932.


Order, as resettled, modified by striking therefrom the provision that the defendant forthwith deliver to the plaintiff the assets, moneys and securities received or held by the said defendant under and pursuant to the agreement mentioned in the complaint and answer, or any substitution for said assets, and by providing that said assets, moneys and securities be delivered to the plaintiff by the defendant on the coming in and confirmation of the report of the referee provided for in said order, upon the payment by the plaintiff to the defendant of the sum of money that may be found due to the defendant from the plaintiff on such accounting for its commissions and expenses. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Katz v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Katz v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company

Case Details

Full title:MAX KATZ, Respondent, v. CENTRAL HANOVER BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)