From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katz v. 30 E 40Th St. JV

Supreme Court, New York County
May 25, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 31695 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)

Opinion

Index No. 160480/2020

05-25-2022

FRANCES KATZ, Plaintiff, v. 30 E 40TH STREET JV, LLC.30 EAST40TH, LLC, SL GREEN REALTY CORP., LAWLAND CORP., NINETY PARK PROPERTY, LLC.WALTER & SAMUELS, INC. Defendants.


Unpublished Opinion

PRESENT: HON. WILLIAM PERRY Justice.

DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION

WILLIAM PERRY, J.S.C.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 were read on this motion to/for AMEND CAPTION/PLEADINGS.

Plaintiff Frances Katz brings this action against Defendants 30 East 40th Street JV LLC, 30 East 40th LLC, SL Green Realty Corporation ("SL Green"), Lawland Corporation, Ninety Park Property LLC ("Ninety Park"), and Walter & Samuels Inc., alleging that she was caused to trip and fall on the sidewalk near 30 East 40th Street, New York, NY due to their negligence.

In motion sequence 001, Plaintiff moves (1) to amend the complaint to add Vornado Realty Trust, the parent company of Ninety Park Property, as an additional defendant; and (2) to deem as admitted by 30 East 40th JV LLC and SL Green the factual assertions contained in her May 27, 2021 Notice to Admit.

"In general, leave to amend should be freely granted in the absence of prejudice or surprise, upon showing that the proposed amendment has merit." (Centrifugal Assocs., Inc. v. Highland Metal Indus., Inc., 193 A.D.2d 385, 385 [1st Dept 1993].) Plaintiff submits sufficient evidence demonstrating that Vornado Realty Trust is the parent company of Ninety Park Property. (NYSCEF Doc No. 34, Memo, at ¶¶ 9-13; Doc No. 40, Insurance Letter; Doc No. 41. SEC Filing.)

In opposition, Ninety Park fails to demonstrate that it would be prejudiced or surprised by the addition of Vornado, nor does it demonstrate that the proposed amendment is utterly devoid of merit at this stage of litigation. Ninety Park's citation to caselaw is inapposite. (NYSCEF Doc No. 50, Opposition, at ¶¶ 17-18, citing Horowitz v Aetna Life Ins., 148 A.D.2d 584, 586 [2d Dept 1989] [granting motion to dismiss causes of action against parent company upon plaintiffs failure to adequately allege control over subsidiary]; Fairpoint Cos., LLC v Vella, 145 A.D.3d 645, 645-646 [1st Dept 2015] [denying motion to add parent company as defendant under alter ego theory upon insufficient allegation of parent company's abuse of corporate form].)

Plaintiffs motion to deem admitted, allegations contained in the May 27, 2021 Notice to Admit (NYSCEF Doc No. 9) is denied.

A preliminary conference pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.12, has not been held in this matter. Moreover,' plaintiff has failed to demonstrate compliance with 22 NYCRR 202.20-f (b). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the second amended summons and complaint, in the form annexed to the motion papers, shall be deemed served upon service of a copy of this order with notice of entry upon all parties in the action; and it is further

ORDERED that the second amended summons and complaint, in the form annexed to the motion papers, shall be served, in accordance with the Civil Practice Law and Rules, upon the additional parties in this action within 30 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry; and it is further

ORDERED that the action shall bear the following caption:

And it is further

ORDERED that counsel for the moving party shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry upon the County Clerk (60 Centre Street, Room 14IB) and the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (60 Centre Street, Room 119), who are directed to mark the court's records to reflect the parties being added pursuant hereto; and it is further

ORDERED that such service upon the County Clerk and the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website at the address (www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh); and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion seeking an order pursuant to CPLR 3123 to deem admitted allegations set forth in the Notice to Admit dated May 27, 2021, is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the parties are directed to meet and confer and electronically file a proposed Preliminary Conference Order for the court's review and signature, within thirty (45) days.


Summaries of

Katz v. 30 E 40Th St. JV

Supreme Court, New York County
May 25, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 31695 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)
Case details for

Katz v. 30 E 40Th St. JV

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES KATZ, Plaintiff, v. 30 E 40TH STREET JV, LLC.30 EAST40TH, LLC, SL…

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: May 25, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 31695 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)