From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katri v. Katri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 2003
1 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-09453.

Submitted October 21, 2003.

November 24, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for the alleged loss of property from a safe deposit box, the defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, n/k/a JP Morgan Chase appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated September 20, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Sandra R. Ahn, New York, N.Y. (Babette V. Orenstein of counsel), for appellant.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, NANCY E. SMITH and STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellant is dismissed, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The action insofar as asserted against the appellant is barred by an executed written release ( see Martino v. Kaschak, 208 A.D.2d 698; Sofio v. Hughes, 162 A.D.2d 518). Even if the release was not enforceable, the appellant would be entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it ( see Greco v. First Union Natl. Bank Corp., 267 A.D.2d 278).

In light of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to address the appellant's remaining contention.

PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, SMITH and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Katri v. Katri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 2003
1 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Katri v. Katri

Case Details

Full title:GILA KATRI, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. FARAG KATRI, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 636