From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katieann Blomberg v. C.N.M. Rose Lounge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 2010
77 A.D.3d 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-07174.

October 26, 2010.

In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Katieann Blomberg appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated June 3, 2009, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant USA Center Moriches Gas and Convenient, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by her against that defendant.

Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Cannavo, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stephen C. Glasser of counsel), for appellant.

La Capra, Salz Kowalski, LLP, Central Islip, N.Y. (Edward S. Kowalski of counsel), for respondent.

Law Offices of Brian J. McGovern, LLC, New York, N.Y. (Michelle A. Cohen of counsel), for defendant Heather Carroll.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Roman, JJ.


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs payable by the respondent, and that branch of the motion of the defendant USA Center Moriches Gas and Convenient, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the appellant against it is denied.

On its motion for summary judgment, the defendant USA Center Moriches Gas and Convenient, Inc. (hereinafter USA Gas), came forward with evidence sufficient to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that it did not sell alcohol to the defendant Heather Carroll on the night of the incident in question. In opposition, the appellant raised a triable issue of fact as to whether Carroll had purchased alcohol from USA Gas.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of USA Gas's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the appellant against it.


Summaries of

Katieann Blomberg v. C.N.M. Rose Lounge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 2010
77 A.D.3d 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Katieann Blomberg v. C.N.M. Rose Lounge

Case Details

Full title:KATIEANN BLOMBERG, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. C.N.M. ROSE LOUNGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 2010

Citations

77 A.D.3d 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7708
909 N.Y.S.2d 640