From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kastner v. Tex. Workforce Comm'n

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Nov 14, 2013
NO. 01-13-00274-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 14, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 01-13-00274-CV

11-14-2013

KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER, Appellant v. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND ROSEHILL ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. DBA HOUSTON ADMIRAL SERVICES, Appellees


On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2011-76848


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kristofer Thomas Kastner, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 51.207, § 51.941(a), § 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. App. A § B(1). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.


Summaries of

Kastner v. Tex. Workforce Comm'n

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Nov 14, 2013
NO. 01-13-00274-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Kastner v. Tex. Workforce Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER, Appellant v. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND…

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

NO. 01-13-00274-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 14, 2013)