From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kastick v. U-Haul Company, Western Michigan [4th Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
(N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 18, 1999)

Opinion

June 18, 1999

PRESENT: DENMAN, P. J., GREEN, HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., AND BALIO, JJ.


Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the decision filed and the ordering paragraph of the order entered March 19, 1999 are amended by providing that the judgment insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law with costs to plaintiff and a new trial is granted on damages for conscious pain and suffering and on whether decedent's death was caused by the motor vehicle accident and, if so, on damages for wrongful death and the first sentence of the last paragraph of the decision filed March 19, 1999 is amended to read as follows: "Thus, we reverse the judgment insofar as appealed from and grant a new trial on damages for conscious pain and suffering and on whether decedent's death was caused by the motor vehicle accident and, if so, on damages for wrongful death."


Summaries of

Kastick v. U-Haul Company, Western Michigan [4th Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
(N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 18, 1999)
Case details for

Kastick v. U-Haul Company, Western Michigan [4th Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE M. KASTICK, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1999

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 18, 1999)