From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kasper and Kasper

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 22, 1989
768 P.2d 447 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

86-770; CA A43560

Argued and submitted April 20, 1988

Affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal February 22, 1989

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Coos County, Robert F. Walberg, Judge.

Michael J. Gillespie, Coquille, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Slack, Stone and Gillespie, Coquille.

Lynn H. Heusinkveld, Coos Bay, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent — cross-appellant.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal. No costs to either party.


In this appeal from a dissolution judgment, husband contends that the trial court erred in its valuation of certain real property. Wife cross-appeals the court's denial of her motion for an accounting and to surcharge husband for personal use of marital assets. Both appeals have merits. However, on de novo review, we conclude, after considering those merits, that the property distribution is equitable.

Affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal. No costs to either party.


Summaries of

Kasper and Kasper

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 22, 1989
768 P.2d 447 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Kasper and Kasper

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Marriage of KASPER, Respondent — Cross-Appellant, and…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 22, 1989

Citations

768 P.2d 447 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
768 P.2d 447