From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kashelkar v. Dave

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 27, 2006
31 A.D.3d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8954, 8955.

July 27, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered January 31, 2003, which partially granted the Sandback defendants' motion for a protective order, and order, same court and Justice, entered June 24, 2003, which removed the action to Civil Court, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Williams, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.


Plaintiff's notice to admit was properly vacated as it improperly sought information about the existence of insurance, a matter that has nothing to do with the elements of plaintiff's claims herein for civil rights and civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) violations ( see Wolin v St. Vincent's Hosp. Med. Ctr. Of N.Y., 304 AD2d 348). Our review of the record indicates that the stricken discovery demands were overly broad and burdensome. The motion court had authority to remove the action to Civil Court without the parties ' consent (CPLR 325 [d]; 22 NYCRR 202.13 [a]).


Summaries of

Kashelkar v. Dave

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 27, 2006
31 A.D.3d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Kashelkar v. Dave

Case Details

Full title:ASHOK KASHELKAR, Appellant, v. RITA DAVE, ESQ., et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 27, 2006

Citations

31 A.D.3d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6050
820 N.Y.S.2d 11