Kartiganer v. Henderson

Full title: ADAM KARTIGANER, Petitioner, v. LEAH R. HENDERSON, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Jul 29, 2011

CV 07-7575 JVS (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2011)

Opinion

ADAM KARTIGANER, Petitioner, v. LEAH R. HENDERSON, Respondent. No. CV 07-7575 JVS (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. July 29, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this petition with prejudice as time-barred.