From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karten v. Kent

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 10, 1990
559 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1054.

April 10, 1990.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Murray Goldman, Judge.

Paul Morris, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Young, Stern Tannenbaum, North Miami Beach, and Andrew S. Berman, for appellees.

Before HUBBART, COPE and LEVY, JJ.


Appellant Alan Karten, defendant below, appeals a final judgment against him on a claim for conversion. We conclude that the law of conversion was correctly applied, Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); that Paul Kent was not an indispensable party, W.R. Cooper, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 512 So.2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); and that no reversible error has been shown with respect to the evidentiary rulings.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Karten v. Kent

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 10, 1990
559 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Karten v. Kent

Case Details

Full title:ALAN IRA KARTEN, APPELLANT, v. ALBERT KENT AND PATRICIA KENT, APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 10, 1990

Citations

559 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)