Summary
relying on Sysco, the court held the restrictive covenant was unreasonable because it prohibited the former employee from competing with Terra not only as to Terra's actual customers but also as to non-Terra customers that Terra unsuccessfully solicited
Summary of this case from Armstrong v. Int'l Stock Food Corp.Opinion
Appeal No. 2016AP2025
09-07-2017
John KARSTEN, Plaintiff, v. TERRA ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert J. Karsten and Midwest Drilled Foundations & Engineering, Inc., Third-Party Defendants, Midwest Drilled Foundations-Landfill Division, LLC and Landfill Drilling & Piping Specialists, LLC, Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Affirmed.