From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karsh v. Schedler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1920
190 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

January, 1920.


The agreement and lease indicate an intention of the parties that the premises in question were to be conveyed as security, the conveyance operating as a mortgage. Respondent must, therefore, be relegated to his action in foreclosure. The order of the County court of Rockland county is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P.J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Karsh v. Schedler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1920
190 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Karsh v. Schedler

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES KARSH, Respondent, v. WALTER SCHEDLER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1920

Citations

190 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)