From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karsch v. Blink Health Ltd.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 17, 2021
17 Civ. 3880 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021)

Opinion

17 Civ. 3880 (VM)

08-17-2021

MICHAEL KARSCH, Plaintiff, v. BLINK HEALTH LTD., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Consistent with the Court's Individual Practices, the defendants in the above-captioned matter filed a letter motion requesting authorization to file two exhibits under seal. (See “Letter Motion, ” Dkt. No. 190.) In particular, Exhibits 2 and 14 to the Declaration of Laura K. Boyle, filed in connection with the defendants' pending motion for summary judgment, contain material designated Highly Confidential for Attorneys' Eyes Only under the governing protective order. (See Dkt. No. 56.) Materials may be sealed “if the sealing order is narrowly tailored to achieve that aim.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion to file Exhibits 2 and 14 under seal (Dkt. No. 190) is GRANTED. Defendants are directed to file redacted versions of these exhibits in the public record.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Karsch v. Blink Health Ltd.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 17, 2021
17 Civ. 3880 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Karsch v. Blink Health Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL KARSCH, Plaintiff, v. BLINK HEALTH LTD., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 17, 2021

Citations

17 Civ. 3880 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021)