From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karriem v. Cnty. of Riverside

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 13, 2021
5:21-cv-01145-GW (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2021)

Opinion

5:21-cv-01145-GW (JDE)

10-13-2021

LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GEORGE H. WU, United States District Judge

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the Complaint (Dkt. 1) filed by Plaintiff Lamont Garner Karriem (“Plaintiff”); Plaintiff's Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 2, “IFP Request”); the operative First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 5, “FAC”); the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 8, “Report”); and the Objections to the Report filed by Plaintiff (Dkt. 9). The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

As a result, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's IFP Request (Dkt. 2) is DENIED;
2. The federal claims asserted in the FAC (Claims One through Six) are DISMISSED with prejudice and the remaining state law claims in the FAC (Claims Seven through Ten) are DISMISSED without prejudice to being reasserted in state court; and
3. Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Karriem v. Cnty. of Riverside

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 13, 2021
5:21-cv-01145-GW (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Karriem v. Cnty. of Riverside

Case Details

Full title:LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 13, 2021

Citations

5:21-cv-01145-GW (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2021)