KARR v. JLH OF ATHENS

5 Citing cases

  1. KARR v. JLH OF ATHENS

    Case No. 01CA16 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2001)   Cited 1 times

    The facts set forth in this opinion have been repeated verbatim from our earlier Decision and Judgment Entry in which we dismissed the appeal for the lack of a final appealable order. See Karr v. JLH of Athens, Inc. (Dec. 4, 2000), Athens App. No. 99CA57, unreported. The matter is once again before this court for review.

  2. Portco v. Eye Specialists

    2007 Ohio 4403 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 19 times

    Additionally, when multiple claims are included in an action, Civ.R. 54(B) also factors into consideration. See In re Berman (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 324, 328, 590 N.E.2d 809; see, also, Karr v. JLH of Athens, Inc. (Dec. 4, 2000), Athens App. No. 99CA57, 2000 WL 33226179; Gallucci v. Freshour (Jun. 22, 2000), Hocking App. No. 99CA22, 2000 WL 864977. Civ.R. 54(B) allows a trial court to enter final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims "only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay."

  3. Bell v. Turner

    2006 Ohio 704 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)

    {¶ 16} Further, when multiple claims or multiple parties are indeed in an action, Civ.R. 54(B) also factors into consideration. See In re Berman (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 324, 328, 590 N.E.2d 809; also see Karr v. JLH of Athens, Inc. (Dec. 4, 2000), Athens App. No. 99CA57; Gallucci v. Freshour (Jun. 22, 2000), Hocking App. No. 99CA22; Byers v. Coppel (Nov. 29, 1999), Ross App. No. 99CA2488. Civ.R. 54(B) states that a trial court may enter final judgment as to "one or more but fewer than all of the claims . . . only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay."

  4. Mortgage Elec. Reg. v. Mullins

    2005 Ohio 2303 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 34 times

    {¶ 17} Further, whenever multiple claims and/or multiple parties appear in an action, the provisions of Civ.R. 54(B) also must be considered. See In re Berman (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 324, 328, 590 N.E.2d 809; also see Karr v. JLH of Athens, Inc. (Dec. 4, 2000), Athens App. No. 99CA57; Gallucci v. Freshour (Jun. 22, 2000), Hocking App. No. 99CA22; Byers v. Coppel (Nov. 29, 1999), Ross App. No. 99CA2488. Civ.R. 54(B) states that a trial court may enter final judgment as to "one or more but fewer than all of the claims . . . only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay."

  5. Mtge. Elec. Registrations Sys. v. Mullins

    2005 Ohio 2303 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 52 times

    {¶ 17} Further, whenever multiple claims or multiple parties appear in an action, Civ.R. 54(B) also must be considered. In re Berman (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 324, 328, 590 N.E.2d 809; see, also, Karr v. JLH of Athens, Inc. (Dec. 4, 2000), Athens App. No. 99CA57, 2000 WL 33226179; Gallucci v. Freshour (June 22, 2000), Hocking App. No. 99CA22, 2000 WL 864977; Byers v. Coppel (Nov. 29, 1999), Ross App. No. 99CA2488, 1999 WL 1125060. Civ.R. 54(B) states that a trial court may enter final judgment as to "one or more but fewer than all of the claims * * * only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay."