From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karr v. HSS, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00138-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00138-RPM

11-09-2012

ERIC KARR, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipal corporation; HSS, Inc., a Colorado Corporation; MR. JOE, acting in his individual capacity as an employee of HSS, Inc.; MRS. MONICA, acting in her individual capacity as an employee of HSS, Inc., SHERIFF DEPUTY BRADY LOVINGIER, in his individual capacity as a Denver County Sheriff; OFFICER JOSHUA HERRICK, in his individual capacity as a Denver Police Officer, and DEPUTY SHERIFF LYNN; DEPUTY SHERIFF K. MARTINEZ; DEPUTY SHERIFF CLYNCKE and DEPUTY SHERIFF E. GIVENS, in their individual capacities as Denver County Sheriffs; Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER AND OFFICER

JOSHUA HERRICK

Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) filed by the defendant The City and County of Denver and Officer Joshua Herrick on September 28, 2012, [21] and the plaintiff's response, filed November 9, 2012, the plaintiff concedes that the allegations of the amended complaint are not sufficient to support liability of The City and County of Denver and agrees that it must be dismissed as a defendant. With respect to the defendant Officer Herrick, the pertinent paragraphs of the amended complaint are paragraphs 30 through 33, alleging that he made the arrest of the plaintiff Eric Karr without probable cause. As noted in paragraph 43 of the amended complaint, the arrest and the criminal case were brought as a result of oral and/or written statements made by Defendants Joe, Monica, other deputy sheriffs and Defendant Lovingier. The motion to dismiss correctly refers to the governing law under the fellow officer rule that permits a police officer to proceed on the basis of statements made to him by other law enforcement officers. The plaintiff has cited no authority that supports a determination that a police officer in Officer Herrick's position would know that under clearly established law he had no probable cause to arrest the plaintiff. According, the doctrine of qualified immunity protects Officer Herrick from liability in this case. It is therefore

ORDERED that this civil action is dismissed as to the Defendant The City and County of Denver and Officer Joshua Herrick.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Karr v. HSS, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00138-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Karr v. HSS, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC KARR, Plaintiff, v. HSS, Inc., a Colorado Corporation; MR. JOE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00138-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 9, 2012)