From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KARR v. BRANT LAKE CAMP, INC. [1st Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1999
265 A.D.2d 184 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 7, 1999

Michael D'Agostino, for Plaintiffs-Respondents.

Morton H. Feder, for Defendant-Appellant.

ROSENBERGER, J.P., TOM, MAZZARELLI, LERNER, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered January 27, 1999, which granted plaintiff's motion for a protective order prohibiting the deposition of a non-resident, non-party witness, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In seeking to take the deposition of its former employee, a non-resident, non-party witness, almost 11 months after the note of issue was filed, defendant failed to demonstrate any unusual or unanticipated circumstance warranting deviation from the rule that disclosure proceedings may not be conducted after the filing of the note of issue (see , White v. Bronx Lebanon Hosp. Ctr., 240 A.D.2d 212).

Motion for a stay denied.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

KARR v. BRANT LAKE CAMP, INC. [1st Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1999
265 A.D.2d 184 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

KARR v. BRANT LAKE CAMP, INC. [1st Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:GAIL BROWN KARR, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BRANT LAKE CAMP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 184 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 140

Citing Cases

Sklarz v. City of N.Y

Although plaintiff contends that faulty lighting or signage contributed to the accident, there was no…

Rosenberg v. Scaringi

In view of the foregoing, defendant's motion to preclude plaintiffs from offering expert evidence as to the…