From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karpel v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1948
273 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

March 1, 1948.

Appeal from Kings County.


Order modified on the law and the facts by striking therefrom the provisions transferring the action to Kings County and inserting in place thereof a provision directing the trial of the consolidated action to be had in Queens County. As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Transferring the trial of the action to Kings County was an improvident exercise of discretion in view of the calendar conditions in the respective counties and the fact that the Queens County action was first begun. ( Funk v. Nelson, 264 App. Div. 876; Gibbs v. Sokol, 216 App. Div. 260; 3 Carmody on New York Pleading and Practice, § 859, p. 1638.) Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Karpel v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1948
273 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Karpel v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:ROSE KARPEL, Plaintiff, v. ALFRED S. ROBERTS, Appellant. HAZEL A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Poolet v. State of N.Y

As stated in Efco Prods. v. Long Is. Baking ( 6 A.D.2d 832, 833): "In any event, the convenience of expert…

Efco Products, Inc. v. Long Island Baking, Inc.

ed ( Bril v. Storm, 275 App. Div. 954; Quality Fruit Wines Corp. v. Singer, 267 App. Div. 834; Funk v.…