Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01476-RPM
02-22-2013
MARY ALICE KAROL, Plaintiff, v. CHAPMAN LAW GROUP, P.C., Defendant.
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF AMENDED
COMPLAINT
On February 12, 2013, the defendant, Bruce d. Chapman, filed a motion for partial dismissal of the amended complaint, [25], seeking dismissal of a claim for lost profits and attorney's fees. The plaintiff filed a motion to file a second amended complaint, on February 20, 2013, correcting the defendant to the Chapman Law Group, P.C. rather than Bruce D. Chapman. That motion was granted and the second amended complaint was filed February 21, 2013. On the same date, the plaintiff filed a response to defendant's motion for partial dismissal of amended complaint, agreeing to withdraw the request for attorney fees. Plaintiff also filed a motion to extend pretrial scheduling order as to naming experts, seeking an extension through April 1st to name experts. That motion will be set for hearing because it is not clear what expert testimony the plaintiff intends to seek. It is now
ORDERED that defendant's motion for partial dismissal of the amended complaint, now addressed to the second amended complaint, is denied and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to extend pretrial scheduling order as to naming experts will be scheduled for hearing.
BY THE COURT:
________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge