From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karohl v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 15, 2024
No. 5670-23 (U.S.T.C. May. 15, 2024)

Opinion

5670-23

05-15-2024

DAVID A. KAROHL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER AND DECISION

Emin Toro, Judge

On May 10, 2024, the parties filed a Proposed Stipulated Decision (Doc. 12). However, upon review of the Proposed Stipulated Decision, the Court notes that the Proposed Stipulated Decision contains an incorrect statutory reference. The Court is therefore unable to process the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision.

In view of the foregoing, and to give effect to the agreement of the parties in this case, it is hereby

ORDERED that the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision (Doc. 12) filed May 10, 2024, is recharacterized as the parties' Settlement Stipulation. It is further

ORDERED AND DECIDED that there is no deficiency in income tax due from, nor overpayment due to, petitioner for the taxable year 2020; and

That there is no penalty due from petitioner for the taxable year 2020 under the provisions of I.R.C. § 6662(a).


Summaries of

Karohl v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 15, 2024
No. 5670-23 (U.S.T.C. May. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Karohl v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:DAVID A. KAROHL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: May 15, 2024

Citations

No. 5670-23 (U.S.T.C. May. 15, 2024)