From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karngbaye v. Harry

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 15, 2024
Civil Action 21-5667 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-5667

03-15-2024

DECEE KARNGBAYE, Petitioner, v. LAUREL HARRY, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

AND NOW, this 15th day of March 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of the pleadings and available state court records, and after review of the

Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge and Petitioner's objections thereto, (ECF No. 17), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED;

4. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this decision. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and

5. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Karngbaye v. Harry

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 15, 2024
Civil Action 21-5667 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Karngbaye v. Harry

Case Details

Full title:DECEE KARNGBAYE, Petitioner, v. LAUREL HARRY, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 15, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 21-5667 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2024)