From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karim v. The City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 20, 2022
22 Civ. 10660 (AT) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 10660 (AT) (JW)

12-20-2022

DHUHA ABDUL KARIM AND TRISTAN ARDREY, Individually and as prospective Administrators of the Estate of the Decedent, ISA-ABDUL KARIM. Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK; MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO; NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION; DR. “WU”; NURSE DE LA CRUZ, R.N; CORRECTION OFFICER “POTTER”; JOHN DOE CORRECTION OFFICIALS SUPERVISING HOUSING ASSIGNMENTS; JOHN DOE CORRECTION OFFICIALS SUPERVISING INTAKE; JOHN DOE CORRECTION OFFICIALS SUPERVISING MEDICAL TRANSPORT; JOHN DOE CORRECTION OFFICERS #1-10; JOHN DOE HEALTH CARE SUPERVISORS ##1- 5; JOHN DOE MEDICAL STAFF ON RIKERS ISLAND ##1-10, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE:

To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge.

If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendants shall, by February 15, 2023, file a frilly executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 and attached to this order, on the docket. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered.

If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by February 15, 2023. advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Karim v. The City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 20, 2022
22 Civ. 10660 (AT) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Karim v. The City of New York

Case Details

Full title:DHUHA ABDUL KARIM AND TRISTAN ARDREY, Individually and as prospective…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 10660 (AT) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2022)