From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kardonsky v. Tozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

June, 1926.


Order denying motion to strike out portions of complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to serve answer within twenty days upon payment of costs. There are three separate appeals printed in one record. In taxing disbursements they should be divided into three parts, one-third to each appeal. Order denying defendant's motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We think that the examination sought in advance of service of answer is premature. Until joinder of issue it is impossible to ascertain what the disputed facts are. Plaintiff may renew the application after issue joined. Order appointing receiver pendente lite affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kapper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kardonsky v. Tozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Kardonsky v. Tozzi

Case Details

Full title:BARNETT KARDONSKY, Respondent, v. JAMES TOZZI, etc., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1926

Citations

217 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

Wilkens v. Hartridge

It was error, in advance of joinder of issue, to direct the examination of plaintiff for use upon the trial.…

Matter of Carll

The examination sought by the widow under section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, in advance of the service of…