From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karascon v. Shaver

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 2, 2024
20-cv-13100 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2024)

Opinion

20-cv-13100

10-02-2024

STEVE ELLIS KARACSON, Petitioner, v. DAVID SHAVER, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR (ECF NO. 40)

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner Steve Karascon has filed a motion to correct a claimed clerical error in an order entered by the Court on September 16, 2024 (ECF No. 36). The motion is DENIED because the order does not contain an error. Contrary to Karascon's motion, the Court correctly cited, as it intended to do, the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in the case of Pouncy v. Palmer. As the Court stated in its order, Karascon and counsel for Respondent shall be prepared to answer questions about that decision by the Sixth Circuit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Karascon v. Shaver

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 2, 2024
20-cv-13100 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Karascon v. Shaver

Case Details

Full title:STEVE ELLIS KARACSON, Petitioner, v. DAVID SHAVER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

20-cv-13100 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2024)