From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karandisecky v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 14, 2021
200 A.D.3d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

14840 Index No. 310180/11E Case No. 2019-05397

12-14-2021

John KARANDISECKY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Law Office of Ephrem J. Wertenteil, New York (Ephrem J. Wertenteil of counsel), for appellant. Cozen O'Connor, New York (Eric J. Berger of counsel), for respondents.


Law Office of Ephrem J. Wertenteil, New York (Ephrem J. Wertenteil of counsel), for appellant.

Cozen O'Connor, New York (Eric J. Berger of counsel), for respondents.

Kern, J.P., Kennedy, Scarpulla, Mendez, Shulman, JJ.

Amended order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered on or about November 4, 2019, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241(6) claim predicated upon Industrial Code ( 12 NYCRR) § 23–1.7(d), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Plaintiff, a subcontractor's foreman, testified that he was attempting to unlock the door of the office trailer at 6:30 a.m. to review construction documents kept therein and to prepare the trailer for the day's employee meeting when he slipped and fell on the staircase landing-platform just outside the trailer door. Photographic exhibits reflect snow and ice on the narrow staircase. This evidence presents issues of fact as to whether plaintiff was engaged in a construction-related activity at the time he slipped and fell (see 12 NYCRR 23–1.4 [b][13]; Gherardi v. City of New York, 49 A.D.3d 280, 852 N.Y.S.2d 126 [1st Dept. 2008] ) and whether the landing on which he fell was the type of surface contemplated under 12 NYCRR 23–1.7(d), i.e., whether it was a "walkway" (see e.g. Quigley v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 168 A.D.3d 65, 90 N.Y.S.3d 156 [1st Dept. 2018] ) or a "passageway" (see Conklin v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth., 49 A.D.3d 320, 855 N.Y.S.2d 54 [1st Dept. 2008] ) or a "platform" (see Beltrone v. City of New York, 299 A.D.2d 306, 749 N.Y.S.2d 271 [2d Dept. 2002] ).


Summaries of

Karandisecky v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 14, 2021
200 A.D.3d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Karandisecky v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:John KARANDISECKY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

200 A.D.3d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
155 N.Y.S.3d 324