From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karam v. Nambiar

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 1, 2020
301 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D18-2332

04-01-2020

Georges Emile KARAM, Appellant, v. Gleema NAMBIAR, Appellee.

Mandel Law Group, P.A., and Roberta G. Mandel, for appellant. The Padron Law Group, P.L.L.C., and Luis M. Padron, Coral Gables, and Brian D. Fell, for appellee.


Mandel Law Group, P.A., and Roberta G. Mandel, for appellant.

The Padron Law Group, P.L.L.C., and Luis M. Padron, Coral Gables, and Brian D. Fell, for appellee.

Before SALTER, SCALES, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rogers v. Rogers, 824 So. 2d 902, 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ("An exception to [the] general rule is that income can be imputed based on gifts if the gifts are continuing and ongoing, not sporadic, and where the evidence shows that the gifts will continue in the future.") (citations omitted).


Summaries of

Karam v. Nambiar

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 1, 2020
301 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Karam v. Nambiar

Case Details

Full title:Georges Emile Karam, Appellant, v. Gleema Nambiar, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Apr 1, 2020

Citations

301 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)