From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karakoc v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 31, 2022
18-cv-06620-RMI (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

18-cv-06620-RMI

08-31-2022

CENGIZ KARAKOC, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

RE: DKT. NO. 36

ROBERT M. ILLMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

This matter having come on regularly before the undersigned upon Plaintiff's Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b), the Court having considered the contentions of Plaintiff and Defendant, good cause having been shown for entry of the Order, now therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's attorney, Geri N. Kahn, is awarded an attorney fee in the sum of $34,785.71, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b). Plaintiff's attorney shall upon receipt of these fees refund to Plaintiff the sum of $5,500.00 which is the amount of EAJA attorney fees previously awarded in this case. Further, because it appears that some of Plaintiff's withheld past-due benefits have already been used to pay attorney fees to a different attorney pursuant to § 406(a), in the event that the amount withheld by the Commissioner is not sufficient to satisfy the § 406(b) fees awarded by this Court, Counsel must recover any remainder of her fees directly from Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Karakoc v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 31, 2022
18-cv-06620-RMI (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Karakoc v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:CENGIZ KARAKOC, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

18-cv-06620-RMI (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2022)