From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaplow v. McCrory

The Supreme Court of Washington
Dec 19, 1933
27 P.2d 1107 (Wash. 1933)

Opinion

No. 24704. Department One.

December 19, 1933.

APPEAL AND ERROR (287) — RECORD — STATEMENT OF FACTS — TIME FOR FILING. A statement of facts not filed within 90 days as required by Rem. Rev. Stat., § 308-7, will be stricken and the judgment affirmed if the questions presented depend on the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Wilson, J., entered May 10, 1933, upon the verdit of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for wrongful death. Affirmed.

Ralph S. Pierce and Edwin J. Cummins, for appellants.

Dore, Beeler Haven, for respondent.


In this action, which was instituted to recover for wrongful death, the verdict was in favor of the plaintiff. From the judgment entered, motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial having been overruled, the defendants appeal.

The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted was entered May 10, 1933. On August 10, 1933, ninety-two days subsequent to the entry of the judgment, the statement of facts was served upon counsel for respondent. On August 14, 1933, ninety-six days after the entry of the judgment, the statement of facts was filed.

[1] Not having been filed within the ninety-day period —

"A proposed bill of exceptions or statement of facts must be served and filed either before or within ninety days after the time begins to run within which an appeal may be taken from the final judgment in the cause . . ." (Rule of Practice VII, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 308-7)

— the statement of facts must be stricken. Perkins v. Perkins, 158 Wn. 351, 290 P. 855; Chelan Electric Co. v. Wick, 148 Wn. 479, 269 P. 827.

The errors assigned are the giving of certain instructions, the admission and rejection of certain evidence, and the denial of the motion for a new trial. There being no statement of facts properly bringing the evidence here, and no question being presented which we can decide without the evidence, the judgment must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Kaplow v. McCrory

The Supreme Court of Washington
Dec 19, 1933
27 P.2d 1107 (Wash. 1933)
Case details for

Kaplow v. McCrory

Case Details

Full title:DORA KAPLOW, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. T.C. McCRORY et al.…

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington

Date published: Dec 19, 1933

Citations

27 P.2d 1107 (Wash. 1933)
27 P.2d 1107
175 Wash. 578

Citing Cases

NUDD v. SEATTLE

[1] As we have repeatedly held, the filing of a proposed statement of facts within the ninety day period is…

Hunter v. Dept. of Labor Industries

We have repeatedly held that a statement of facts filed after the time prescribed by the statute will, upon…