From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaplinsky v. Goldstein

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51901 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

Opinion

2005-550 K C.

Decided November 21, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Eric I. Prus, J.), entered October 25, 2004. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and BELEN, JJ.


Plaintiff commenced the instant small claims action to recover the sum of $2,526.49 for damage her vehicle allegedly sustained as a result of a motor vehicle accident. At trial, plaintiff submitted into evidence one itemized estimate for the sum of $1,100.00 representing the cost to repair her vehicle. CCA 1804 provides in pertinent part that "[a]n itemized bill or invoice, receipted or marked paid, or two itemized estimates for services or repairs, are admissible in evidence and are prima facie evidence of the reasonable value and necessity of such services and repairs." Thus, the evidence proffered by plaintiff at trial was insufficient to establish her damages for the cost to repair her vehicle. Accordingly, substantial justice was done between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1807).


Summaries of

Kaplinsky v. Goldstein

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51901 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
Case details for

Kaplinsky v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:REGINA H. KAPLINSKY, Appellant, v. LEAH GOLDSTEIN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2005

Citations

2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51901 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
809 N.Y.S.2d 481