From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaplan v. Hirsh

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 27, 1982
765 F.2d 421 (4th Cir. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-1789.

May 27, 1982.


ORDER

For reasons appearing to the court,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. the panel and dissenting opinions are withdrawn ( 696 F.2d 1046);

2. the appeal is dismissed for mootness;

3. the case is remanded to the District Court for dismissal for mootness;

4. Judge Murnaghan notes that the panel majority opinion had, in all events, already been vacated, as a consequence of the vote by a majority of the members of the Court in active service in favor of rehearing en banc.

Entered at the direction of Judge Hall with the concurrence of the active circuit judges of this court.


Summaries of

Kaplan v. Hirsh

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 27, 1982
765 F.2d 421 (4th Cir. 1982)
Case details for

Kaplan v. Hirsh

Case Details

Full title:DR. HARRY KAPLAN, APPELLANT v. SAMUEL HIRSH, APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 27, 1982

Citations

765 F.2d 421 (4th Cir. 1982)

Citing Cases

Blixseth v. Glasser

The Registration Statute was enacted as part of the 1948 reform of the Judicial Code. The language of the…