From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaplan v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 29, 1994
29 F.3d 111 (3d Cir. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-1814.

June 29, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 92-00210).

Present: BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.


SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING


The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above captioned matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

By the Court,

/s/ William D. Hutchinson ______________________ WILLIAM D. HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge

DATED: June 29, 1994


Summaries of

Kaplan v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 29, 1994
29 F.3d 111 (3d Cir. 1994)
Case details for

Kaplan v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL KAPLAN; CAROL KAPLAN; MK INVESTMENTS, INC., APPELLANTS, v. FIRST…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 1994

Citations

29 F.3d 111 (3d Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Prudential-Bache Sec.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in a case that involves the proper standard of a court's…

GIL v. RELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY

"Generally, of course, an agent of a disclosed principal, even one who negotiates and signs a contract for…