From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaplan v. D'Agostino Supermarkets, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1994
210 A.D.2d 79 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 8, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.).


The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in denying vacatur of the default judgment against defendant pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) on the ground that defendant's failure to keep a correct address on file with the Secretary of State for more than 10 years was "inexcusable" (see, Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 143), or pursuant to CPLR 317 on the ground that defendant's failure to personally receive notice of the summons was a result of deliberate attempt to avoid such notice (see, supra). As the IAS Court found, such avoidance was inferable from defendant's successful motion, made some three years prior to the commencement of this action, to dismiss another action because of the plaintiff's failure therein to enter a default judgment within a year after defendant had been served through delivery of process to the Secretary of State, and defendant's subsequent failure to advise the Secretary of State of its new address (see, Conte Cadillac v C.A.R.S. Purch. Serv., 126 A.D.2d 621, 622). We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Kupferman, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Kaplan v. D'Agostino Supermarkets, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1994
210 A.D.2d 79 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Kaplan v. D'Agostino Supermarkets, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JACK KAPLAN, Respondent, v. D'AGOSTINO SUPERMARKETS, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 79 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 277

Citing Cases

Santiago v. Sansue Realty Corp.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not notify the Secretary of State of its purported change of address. Under…

Fayed v. Barak

Having failed to answer the allegations, defendant is deemed to have "admit[ted] all traversable allegations…