From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kapitanov v. Vranau

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 21, 2021
322 So. 3d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1928

07-21-2021

Ivan KAPITANOV, et al., Appellants, v. Vasile Silviu VRANAU, et al., Appellees.

Sunrise Law Firm, PLLC, and Anna V. Perekotiy, for appellants. Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Therese A. Savona and Alexandra Valdes (Orlando), for appellees.


Sunrise Law Firm, PLLC, and Anna V. Perekotiy, for appellants.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Therese A. Savona and Alexandra Valdes (Orlando), for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Young v. Achenbauch, 136 So. 3d 575, 581 (Fla. 2014) ("The standard of review for orders entered on motions to disqualify counsel is that of an abuse of discretion. While the trial court's discretion is limited by the applicable legal principles, the appellate court will not substitute its judgment for the trial court's express or implied findings of fact which are supported by competent substantial evidence." (quoting Applied Digit. Sols., Inc. v. Vasa, 941 So. 2d 404, 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) )).


Summaries of

Kapitanov v. Vranau

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 21, 2021
322 So. 3d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Kapitanov v. Vranau

Case Details

Full title:Ivan KAPITANOV, et al., Appellants, v. Vasile Silviu VRANAU, et al.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

Citations

322 So. 3d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)