Kapitanov v. Vranau

Full title: Ivan Kapitanov, et al., Appellants, v. Vasile Silviu Vranau, et al.…

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

No. 3D20-1928 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 21, 2021)

Opinion

3D20-1928

07-21-2021

Ivan Kapitanov, et al., Appellants, v. Vasile Silviu Vranau, et al., Appellees.

Sunrise Law Firm, PLLC, and Anna V. Perekotiy, for appellants. Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Therese A. Savona and Alexandra Valdes (Orlando), for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica Diaz, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 20-21380

Sunrise Law Firm, PLLC, and Anna V. Perekotiy, for appellants.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Therese A. Savona and Alexandra Valdes (Orlando), for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Young v. Achenbauch, 136 So.3d 575, 581 (Fla. 2014) ("The standard of review for orders entered on motions to disqualify counsel is that of an abuse of discretion. While the trial court's discretion is limited by the applicable legal principles, the appellate court will not substitute its judgment for the trial court's express or implied findings of fact which are supported by competent substantial evidence." (quoting Applied Digit. Sols., Inc. v. Vasa, 941 So.2d 404, 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006))).