From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaotica IP Corp. v. Iconic Mars Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 21, 2022
No. 2022-1816 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2022-1816

10-21-2022

KAOTICA IP CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ICONIC MARS CORPORATION, OLUSEYI JAMES OLALEYE, Defendants-Appellees


This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:21-cv-00433-CAB-DEB, Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo.

Before DYK, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

ORDER

REYNA, CIRCUIT JUDGE.

Before the filing of its opening brief, the appellant Kaotica IP Corp. moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. The appellees respond that they "have incurred costs and attorney's fees on this appeal, and [they] wish to abide by this Court's determination concerning whether costs and/or attorney's fees are recoverable in these circumstances." Resp. at 1.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The court has sua sponte determined that the award of attorneys' fees and costs is not appropriate. Kaotica's motion is granted to the extent the appeal is dismissed with each party to bear its own costs.

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 21, 2022


Summaries of

Kaotica IP Corp. v. Iconic Mars Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 21, 2022
No. 2022-1816 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Kaotica IP Corp. v. Iconic Mars Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KAOTICA IP CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ICONIC MARS CORPORATION, OLUSEYI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-1816 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 21, 2022)