From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C. v. Ayrovainen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 26, 2014
122 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-00329

11-26-2014

KANTROWITZ, GOLDHAMER & GRAIFMAN, P.C., appellant, v. Cindy Ann AYROVAINEN, also known as Cindy Ann Lauder, respondent.

Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C., Chestnut Ridge, N.Y. (Reginald H. Rutishauser of counsel), appellant pro se. Karen Winner, New York, N.Y., for respondent.


Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C., Chestnut Ridge, N.Y. (Reginald H. Rutishauser of counsel), appellant pro se.

Karen Winner, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, and SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

Opinion

In an action to recover unpaid legal fees, the plaintiff appeals, by permission, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Walsh II, J.), dated January 9, 2014, as, sua sponte, disqualified attorney Barry Kantrowitz from representing the plaintiff in this action.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly disqualified attorney Barry Kantrowitz from representing the plaintiff in this action, for the reasons stated in a companion appeal (see Lauder v. Goldhamer, 122 A.D.3d 908, 998 N.Y.S.2d 79 [decided herewith] ). Further, it was a proper exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to disqualify Kantrowitz, sua sponte, based upon its finding in the related action involving the same parties (see Flushing Sav. Bank v. FSB Props., 105 A.D.2d 829, 830, 482 N.Y.S.2d 29 ).


Summaries of

Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C. v. Ayrovainen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 26, 2014
122 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C. v. Ayrovainen

Case Details

Full title:Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C., appellant, v. Cindy Ann…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
122 A.D.3d 908
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8320

Citing Cases

Russ & Russ, P.C. v. Joseph Chuang, Uni-Rty Corp.

Further, given the obvious conflict with this Rule, the Court may and will act sua sponte. See Kantrowitz,…

Glob. Horizon Funding v. Prestige Trucking Glob.

The court therefore requested, sua sponte, that the parties submit letter briefing on the issue of…