From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kant v. Cohen

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 8, 2012
468 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-1844

03-08-2012

CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JAY L. COHEN, Defendant - Appellee.

Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Jay L. Cohen, Appellee Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08-cv-00318-RWT)

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Jay L. Cohen, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district court's order affirming the clerk's order taxing costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kant v. Cohen, No. 8:08-cv-00318-RWT (D. Md. filed July 11, 2011; entered July 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Kant v. Cohen

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 8, 2012
468 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Kant v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JAY L. COHEN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

468 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2012)