From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kansupda v. Baptista Delivery Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 22, 2022
18-cv-02133-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2022)

Opinion

18-cv-02133-HSG

06-22-2022

AMIT KANSUPDA, Plaintiff, v. BAPTISTA DELIVERY SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART PLAINTIFF'S THIRD MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT RE: DKT. NOS. 74, 61

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge.

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Westmore's Report and Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Plaintiff's Third Motion for Default Judgment. The time for objections has passed and none were filed. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, the Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part. The Court DENIES the Motion for Default Judgment as to the PAGA claims and penalties and DISMISSES those claims, and it orders the Clerk to enter judgment in accordance with the Report and Recommendation and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Kansupda v. Baptista Delivery Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 22, 2022
18-cv-02133-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Kansupda v. Baptista Delivery Servs.

Case Details

Full title:AMIT KANSUPDA, Plaintiff, v. BAPTISTA DELIVERY SERVICES, LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 22, 2022

Citations

18-cv-02133-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2022)

Citing Cases

Valenzuela v. Best-Line Shades, Inc.

“A party seeking default judgment bears the burden of demonstrating to the Court that the complaint is…