Kansas City So. Ry. Co. v. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Com'n

1 Citing case

  1. United States v. Carter

    121 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 1960)   Cited 5 times

    We think it unnecessary to do more than mention a number of decisions to the same point. See Kansas City So. Ry. Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission, 225 La. 399, 73 So.2d 188; United States v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 393 Pa. 537, 143 A.2d 341; Arkansas Power Light Co. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission, Ark., 330 S.W.2d 51; Benton Rapid Express, Inc. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 171 F. Supp. 868; Union Transfer Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 168 F. Supp. 217; Hughes Transport, Inc. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 168 F. Supp. 219. Although the Commission's order under review announces a contrary position, the respondents by their briefs reluctantly concede that the decisions which we have mentioned preclude them from regulating intrastate rates for the transportation of property owned by the United States Government. They continue to contend that the same rule does not apply to the transportation of property owned by service personnel when such transportation is effected by the government under the circumstances summarized above.