From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kania v. Chicagos&sNorthwestern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Feb 27, 1973
57 Wis. 2d 761 (Wis. 1973)

Opinion


204 N.W.2d 681 (Wis. 1973) 57 Wis.2d 761 Bruce KANIA, a minor, by his gdn. ad litem, et al., Appellants, v. CHICAGOs&sNORTHWESTERN RY. CO., Respondent. No. 327. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. February 27, 1973.

        Appeal from Circuit Court, Milwaukee County; John A. Decker, Judge.

        Action for personal injuries. Plaintiffs appeal from an order striking a demand for treble damages under sec. 195.35, Stats., in their complaint.

        Habush, Gillick, Habush, Daviss&sMurphy, Milwaukee (Howard A. Davis, Milwaukee, of counsel), for appellants.

        Borgelt, Powell, Petersons&sFrauen, Milwaukee (Joseph D. McDevitt, Milwaukee, of counsel), for respondent.

        PER CURIAM.

        Plaintiffs argue that the motion to strike was the equivalent of a demurrer because their claim for treble damages is a separate cause of action, relying on Chrome Plating Co. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. (1942), 241 Wis. 554, 6 N.W.2d 692. In that case we held that the record would not sustain a recovery on grounds of ordinary negligence. The case was tried on the basis of liability for treble damages under sec. 196.64, Stats. We held this required proof of a wilful and wanton violation, and precluded comparison of negligence. In the Chrome Plating Company case, as well as the other cases cited in that opinion, violation of a safety statute providing for treble damages was equated with gross negligence. We have since abolished the doctrine of gross negligence in Wisconsin, and have determined that a comparison can be made between all degrees of negligence. Bielski v. Schulze (1962), 16 Wis.2d 1, 114 N.W.2d 105. Since gross negligence is no longer a separate cause of action, there is no reason to hold that a treble damage claim is a separate cause of action.

        The issue determined by the trial court in this case could not have been reached on demurrer. The prayer for relief being no substantive part of the complaint, a prayer asking for more relief than the plaintiff's pleaded facts entitle him to have is not reached by demurrer. Whittier v. Atkinson (1941), 236 Wis. 432, 295 N.W. 781. An order striking a portion of a pleading is not appealable unless it has the legal effect of a demurrer. Gauger v. Ludwig (1972), 56 Wis.2d 492, 202 N.W.2d 233. Plaintiffs will have to wait to raise the issue of treble damages.

        The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Kania v. Chicagos&sNorthwestern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Feb 27, 1973
57 Wis. 2d 761 (Wis. 1973)
Case details for

Kania v. Chicagos&sNorthwestern Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Bruce KANIA, a minor, by his gdn. ad litem, et al., Appellants, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Feb 27, 1973

Citations

57 Wis. 2d 761 (Wis. 1973)
57 Wis. 2d 761

Citing Cases

Recycleworlds Consulting v. Wisconsin Bell

We agree with Ameritech that § 196.64, STATS., does not establish a cause of action separate from one…

Peissig v. Wisconsin Gas Co.

See also Reuling v. Chicago, St. P., M. O. R. Co., 257 Wis. 485, 44 N.W.2d 253 (1950). More recently,…