From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kangarlou v. Locklear

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 26, 2022
2:18-cv-02286-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-cv-02286-JAD-BNW

08-26-2022

Saeid Sam Kangarlou, Plaintiff v. Alton Al Locklear, et al., Defendants


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING JOINT MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

[ECF NOS. 83, 86]

Jennifer A. Dorsey U.S. District Judge

The magistrate judge has considered the defendants' joint motion to enforce an agreement to settle this matter and recommends that I deny it because there was no meeting of the minds. The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was August 25, 2022, and no party filed anything or asked to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.

ECF No. 83.

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 86] is ADOPTED in its entirety. The Joint Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement [ECF No. 83] is DENIED.


Summaries of

Kangarlou v. Locklear

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 26, 2022
2:18-cv-02286-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Kangarlou v. Locklear

Case Details

Full title:Saeid Sam Kangarlou, Plaintiff v. Alton Al Locklear, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 26, 2022

Citations

2:18-cv-02286-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 26, 2022)