From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kang Jai Ass'n v. Poon Gee Datt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 1952
279 App. Div. 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

February 18, 1952.


In an action by membership corporations against two officers for an accounting by reason of alleged improper appropriation of funds, and for other relief, order denying motion under subdivision 5 (now subdivision 4) of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss complaint, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Where a complaint states any cause of action, it may not be dismissed on a motion of this character. ( Cornehlsen v. Dudensing, 270 App. Div. 1037.) Here the plaintiffs are the corporations and may assert a cause of action for an accounting. (General Corporation Law, §§ 60, 61.) On its face the complaint does not show that the institution of the action has been without proper authorization. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kang Jai Ass'n v. Poon Gee Datt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 1952
279 App. Div. 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Kang Jai Ass'n v. Poon Gee Datt

Case Details

Full title:KANG JAI ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Respondents, v. POON GEE DATT et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 18, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)