From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kanelos v. County of Mohave

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 14, 2010
No. CV-10-8099-PCT-GMS (D. Ariz. Jul. 14, 2010)

Opinion

No. CV-10-8099-PCT-GMS.

July 14, 2010


ORDER


Pending before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion to Continue (Doc. 9) and Motion to Change Venue (Doc. 10); and Motion for Join[d]er (Doc. 14) filed by Western States Constitutionalist Alliance, Inc. ("Western States").

The proposed Plaintiff Western States being an organization must be represented by counsel. Only licensed attorneys may represent a corporation or other association in federal court. Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Counsel, 506 U.S. 194, 201-202 (1993) ("It has been the law for the better part of two centuries . . . that a corporation may appear in federal courts only through licensed counsel.") (citing Osborn v. President of Bank of U.S., 9 Wheat. 738, 829, 6 L.Ed. 204 (1824)); D-Beam Ltd. P'ship v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc., 366 F.3d 972, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2004) ("It is a longstanding rule that `corporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorney.'") (alteration and citation omitted); In re Am. W. Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir. 1994) ("Corporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorney."); United States v. High Country Broad. Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993) (holding that a corporation's president and sole shareholder could not make an "end run around" the counsel requirement by intervening pro se rather than retaining counsel to represent the corporation) (citing 28 U.S.C. 1654).

Western States' attempt to file a separate suit and then move for joinder is not possible until, at minimum, it complies with this and other Rules of Court. Plaintiff Kanelos therefore provides no basis on which to continue the scheduling conference.

Plaintiff's Motion to Change Venue will be denied as moot. This action is already assigned to the Prescott Division. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Continue (Doc. 9) is denied.

2. Plaintiff's Motion to Change Venue (Doc. 10) is denied as moot.

3. Western States Constitutionalist Alliance, Inc.'s Petition for Join[d]er (Doc. 14) is denied.


Summaries of

Kanelos v. County of Mohave

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 14, 2010
No. CV-10-8099-PCT-GMS (D. Ariz. Jul. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Kanelos v. County of Mohave

Case Details

Full title:Jim Kanelos, as a single man, Plaintiff, v. County of Mohave, a government…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jul 14, 2010

Citations

No. CV-10-8099-PCT-GMS (D. Ariz. Jul. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

Jury v. U.S. Cong.

Here, Plaintiff describes itself as an organization composed of thousands of members across the United…