From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kane v. Young

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 16, 1989
543 So. 2d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

Nos. 88-773, 88-909, 88-910, 89-63 and 89-64.

April 25, 1989. Rehearing Denied June 16, 1989.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Edward N. Moore, Judge.

Lanza, O'Connor, Armstrong, Sinclair Tunstall, Coral Gables, Rhea P. Grossman, Miami, for appellant/cross-appellees Kane and Maragh.

Conroy, Simberg Lewis and Henry T. Wihnyk, Hollywood, for appellees/cross-appellants Young.

Snyder, Phillips Segal and Gary S. Phillips, North Miami Beach, and Philip J. Kantor, for cross-appellee White House Inn.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BARKDULL, J., and JOHN W. DELL, Associate Judge.


Appellant, Daniel H. Kane, M.D., appeals from a final judgment, entered in favor of appellees, Joyce Young and Burton Young. Appellees Joyce Young and Burton Young cross-appeal and claim the record does not support the jury's finding of ninety percent comparative negligence against Joyce Young, nor does it support the final judgments entered on jury verdicts in favor of cross-appellees, Hal Maragh, M.D. and G. Brest Corporation, d/b/a White House Inn. Neither appellant Kane nor cross-appellants, Joyce and Burton Young, have demonstrated error in the entry of the aforementioned judgments. Accordingly, we affirm.

We reverse the final judgment awarding attorney's fees, pursuant to section 768.56, Florida Statutes (1983), to G. Brest Corporation, d/b/a White House Inn. See Gershuny v. Martin McFall Messenger Anesthesia Professional Association, 539 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 1989).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.


Summaries of

Kane v. Young

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 16, 1989
543 So. 2d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Kane v. Young

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL H. KANE, M.D., APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, v. JOYCE YOUNG AND BURTON…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 16, 1989

Citations

543 So. 2d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)