Opinion
Submitted September 27, 2000
October 23, 2000.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated November 10, 1999, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Alan S. Ripka, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N Y [Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for appellant.
Jeffrey Samel Partners, New York N.Y. (Herzfeld Rubin, P.C. [Herbert Rubin, David B. Hamm, and Neil R. Finkston] of counsel), for respondents.
Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff's failure to appear for a physical examination as required by General Municipal Law § 50-h was due to the failure of the defendant New York City Housing Authority to provide him with a scheduled date for the physical examination (see, General Municipal Law §§ 50-e, 50-h; Ramos v. New York City Hous. Auth., 256 A.D.2d 195; Ruiz v. New York City Hous. Auth ., 216 A.D.2d 258; McCormack v. Port Washington Union Free School Dist., 214 A.D.2d 546). In addition, the plaintiff's notice of claim was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of General Municipal Law § 50-e (see, O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 358).