From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kane v. Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

November, 1916.


The injunction order appears to have been granted without any security, and no provision is made for security in the order. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 620; Howley v. Francis Press, 127 App. Div. 646; Feller v. Kronowitz, 137 id. 896.) The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs. This is, however, without prejudice to renewing this motion at Special Term with a proper undertaking under Code of Civil Procedure, section 620. Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P.J., not voting.


Summaries of

Kane v. Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Kane v. Connell

Case Details

Full title:JAMES KANE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM F. CONNELL and JOHN HEICHEL, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)